It is hopefully already clear that the "sender-message-receiver" model of communication is, at best, an over-simplification.

I guess I'm feeling a bit more confident in how I tackle the media. Watching documentarys I'm able to understand a bit more the social implications

Looking at the communication

I? have started to look differently at the recyprical reinforcement exhibited in communication on a day to day basis thanks to the article....

bringing things together on the group task

I've successfully been able to put together my part of the presentation. i know we should have enjoyed the expereicne and the real assessment is in the reflective journal, but I've still found it quite difficult.

Firstly I couldn't remember any one media thing from my past that deeply affected me. And when I came up with some ideas my reflection as to how they may have effected me were a bit lame. Firstly I started out by listing everything - following other members in the group initially. and then other members realised that they wouldn't want to cover everything and whittles it down to one area. So I tried to do the same, came up with a computer game, illustrated this but found that it wasn't enough to draw from, so I wrote an alternative looking at impact of TV programme 'tomorroe's world' but then decided that actually I couldn't remember any of this either! So I slept on it and I awoke with a feeling that one game wasn't enough (and it wasn't good enough anyway) but to look at a thread of games from the male role-model perspective mixed with video clips rolled up into a Prezi. which is great because I knew that I would enjoy talking about the games, and enjoy learning a new tool in Prezi and workign out how to get youtube videos in there, with possibly remixing exiting youtube videos. SO I wrote out a basic script but still had to pad out with possible inferences the games had on my pshychi.

Meanwhile the other group members were contributing online and the Doodle poll identified 4pm today as a good time to meet on Wimba space. So we did this for 4pm. It was useful we:

Decided about the group - 2 weren't active (Julian) and Ali had explained that for a personal reason he could not help out. So we decided that it was just the four of us.

I seem to have engaged more with the distance students than the ones I meet in class. Even though I have to present with Virginia as we are both here I seem to have interacted with her less. When it came to the Wimba session she only communicated through text chat. Suzanne used voice chat. I used voice chat briefly showing my webcam at the beginning, and Mike was on webcam and voice all the time. i understand that Virginia is a non english native speaker and this is probably the reason. I hate being on webcam beacuase I'm always dressed in my scruffy cardigan but it does make you feel a bit creepy when other people don't want to reveal themselves online.

We decided the running format, identified that we needed an intro and conclusinon to tie it together and we negotiated on who would formulate and present.

We worked out where we would upload out presentation.

Suzanne asked for help on sharing her PowerPoint with voice presentation and we went through some options and I suggested Slideshare with which she has asked for help. So I will work on this this evening.

finally Mike expressed his pleasure and surprise that we were able to piecce this together in a week. I was a bit surprised at hearing this as I still regard it to be a presentation of small work-alone pieces. But there we are

group task work so far

It was an interesting start. I didn't engage until quite late in the time we had to do the task, but by the time I had I saw that there quite a few posts from people trying to arrange a hookup meeting for last week, but it looked as though not everyone had been able to commit to a time or place.

So I suppose we were on our back foot somewhat. I'd just come out of a task in DET which had involved quite a lot of groupwork so was used to talking with people online and getting things done with quite animated team mates. And the group in CIE was new to me for the most part so I had to build up to it again.

Aside from suggesting times for synchrounous meetings I tried to start a new thread examining the task - because it would be embarrassing if we would know what to talk about once online, and a couple of the distance students engaged with that, and a new thread was started that looked at timetabling the owkr and how were we going to tackle it. Here I found that there was a difference of opininon in the group as one team mate I think was a bit stressed by the lack of time and suggested that rather than trying to work on it together for each person to form their own mini presentation and then join these together. One of the other team mates expressed concern at that in probably producing a quite disjointed presentation. The first poster said that she had a friend who did this course last year and that's how she did it.

I can understand this, and it's good to use other people's wisdom if you can, but I think that I have come across this way of working before often by people who are worried that other people aren't pulling their weight, or are stressed that the task will not take place in the time given, or it seems too complicated to coordinate. I suppose I feel a bit dissappointed (I posted as much) because I want it to be a fun and interesting presentation and it will seem as though we've all done a mini presentation each.

One way forward has been put and that is to tackle this chronologically - only no-one is yet revealing what they will cover!

Bringing discussion thoughts home through reading

Had some major win by starting to read more of the set texts. I have early unwrapped my xmas present of a kindle which means that its easier to read on my coomute. I've got a lot from scaffolding text to see how scaffolding works which already has helped in my work in understanding how we can support multidiscipline ict skills in students. Also the skinner article and artefacts politics.

But the most useful test is Construction dialogue in ICT professional development for the transformation of teachers' pedagogical beliefs and practices' by Sarah Prestridge. This is based around qualitive analysis of discussion boards used by networks of teachers in australia to collaboratively reflect on ICT multiliteracy development support in schoolkids. Her points on the types of artefacts of interaction affirm a lot of what I have felt in discussion group tasks so far.

Before reading this I felt that they were rather competitive places. I had come into a forum with a poster who was clearly well read and felt rather inhibited to post my self. Threads may stop suddenly as users choose to disengage. There are warm up activities such as trialling technology, introducing or excsing yourself. Mechanisms by which feedback is given supporting and comparison, paraphrsing. That many things aim only to build/reinforce community. I took that to mean that not everypost has necessarily to cover new ground but may instead by used cohease posters. By having a community this allows for discussion to cover more ground and recognition of fuller argument.

Sometimes there is need for a leader, overtimes when that leader needs to de-peer themselves and make requesat for comments by 3rd party.

Sometimes postings are disregarded and threads ignored or ended. This may happen and domething I am guilty of myself. As the author points out this could be to do with disagreement or lack of understanding of perception being put forwars, or inconfidence to enter into critical discourse. I have found this on th forums I was at. Often this guys posts are so long and fullscoping a response would in itself be long and not fit into the flexible mode of use I require of discussion boards. Also the content so full ranging in motive and ideas already concrete makes it difficult to take forwards.

So I may feel safer to be a lurker in the hope of inactive engagement is recognised as a useful activity. A post made may well be misplaced, along the wrong track for the values required in area of analysis but there must be a 'spae fornegotiation and misunderstanding'. So I can again rest easy.

How will I ytake this forward? I will look out for and respond to community building, encouragement for critical thinking. I will feel more confident in my posts as my own experience can apply practical thought.

It related to the guest speaker in last weeks cie on the types of enagaement seen on bulletin boards and chat.

Experience from first online session

First time we used Wimba to hold a virtual session today and I feel good about it. There were quite a lot of points i noticed about considerations, but also I feel that I'm able to stand back from the experience and make some overall observations tht leads to thoughts and conclusions.

Firstly there was a bit of setting up time involved. Cormac had advised to get there a bit earlier and I think most of did this. Certainly at 5mins to the start when I joined most people were already there. One of the participants joined later on via phone which was an interesting experience - her voice signal was better than all but we also had to consider her lack of senses while we used Wimba's mixed model mediums. There was a bit of time spent at the beginning of the class were Cormac welcomed us all one by one and encouraged us to use our webcam or Talk button to introduce ourselves to the session. there were participants there who were distance students with whom I had not talked to, in a way that's a pity. I guess that this scene setting is important.

It was interesting see other participants in their own environment. I would imagaine that most had spent some time (if they intended to use their webcam) in dressing the environment. Cormac at one point apolagised because he blew his nose but again this might be one consideration as he does not have a room of people seemingly in front of him it's something to consider.

It was really good with Cormac leading a small presentation. I loved having the chatroom there. It was like having a running commentary/conversation on the course of the lecture without feeling as if we are being rude. I thought that it allowed us to have a joint consciousness on interpretation of the resources that Cormac was using. There was an element of peer support and chat which was good. Sometimes I felt that with such a lot on screen Cormac would regulalry loose the plot of the presentation to read the chat. I wonder what it would be like as a presenter - would he be looking to use the chat window in much the same way as he would look to his in-class students for their level of comprehension or interavctivity. It was really good, and I think it brought us to a deeper level of understanding. I think that it would have been difficult to have followed a really long presentation particularly if it had of been a 'less interesting' subject (luckily Cormac's lecture in a/sync comms was good like all of his lectures!).

There wasn't much chance for non-listening, discussion activities, for example to set tasks. By having a smaller group size I suppose that throughout the course of the lecture we were carrying out what would be a discussion activity, and again there were benefits through people being able to contribute via text chat. But not much scope for break out rooms.

There was talk about weither this would work in sharing a live event, or for students in class sat next to each other. It would be interesting to see groups present via this method.

There was a lot of analysis of the use of Txtspeech and ways of abreviating. Maybe we could talk faster and use the language we would normally use in this mode of comms.

We were excited to use this new medium and it would be good to do this again now that we know what to expect.

The group size was small. I wondered if people interacted in the same wasy as if we were holding the class face to face. People who would normally be vocal in class were also also active online. I noticed that practically all had responded and raised points using one of the methods provided by wimba. I wondered if thos that would be more vocal in class were quieter online, as if they gave everybody an equal chance to speak. I'm not sure.

Overall a very positive experience. I only lost the connection once thanks to a colleague moving me on. But I feel totally nourished by the exp.